Or:

You may be an ambassador to England or France
You may like to gamble, you might like to dance
You may be the heavyweight champion of the world
You may be a socialite with a long string of pearls
But you’re gonna have to Serve Somebody, yes
Indeed you’re gonna have to Serve Somebody
Well, it may be the devil or it may be the Lord
But you’re gonna have to Serve Somebody

Think about the songs above, and the many thousands of contrast songs like them, with the ‘But’ removed. The contrast might in some cases be implicit, and still work, but in most cases the main idea would be unclear.

‘And’ is one of the most commonly used words in the English language. I’m not talking here about its usual connective function (‘You And I’, ‘Ebony and Ivory’). I’m talking about the problems that emerge when ‘And’ is used interchangeably with ‘But’. I hear this done in a lot of songs and it makes a mess.

Think if Bono had sung, ‘And I still haven’t found what I’m looking for’, making the Title an idea added to the Verse, instead of the contradiction (‘But’) that gives the Title its impact. Same with Dylan’s ‘Serve Somebody’, Vernon Duke & Ira Gershwin’s ‘I Can’t Get Started’, and many, many others. They wouldn’t pop without the contrast.

Less common, but still frequent, is the opposite – using ‘But’ where ‘And’ would suffice. It’s obviously best to use ‘And’ when adding a thought, as opposed to contradicting the previous one (which usually has the most impact as it’s used in the lyrics above, going into a Chorus or Title).

The biggest issue here, though, is using these two words in a lyric as if they’re interchangeable. They’re not. Take a second look at the ‘Buts’ and ‘Ands’ in your songs.

Let me know your thoughts, additions, disagreements in the Comments section below:

And please share on facebook etc. by clicking these tabs –

The post “I like Big Buts and I Cannot Lie” appeared first on Tony Conniff.