Site Loader
New York, NY

Even more than most of these posts, this is just an opinion.  But my opinion is…

Except in certain types of songs, it’s almost always better to use ‘I’ instead of ‘we’.

Many writers, from famous to obscure, like to generalize, or maybe they’re attempting to universalize or philosophize, by using the word ‘We’ (in a general way, not about couples – ‘Tramps like us, baby we were Born To Run’ is a whole different thing!).  For instance, this is a type of lyric I’ve heard many times –

We break each others’ hearts
When we know we really love
The one we hurt

OK.  But I ask myself, Why not sing something like –

I break your lonely heart
When I know I really love
The one I hurt

To me, the second one is so much stronger.  As a listener, I connect and identify with the ‘I’ perspective… it tells me the narrator has done this themself, they’ve actually experienced and felt what they’re singing about (whether the writer really has or not).  I believe them and I identify (only if the song itself is emotionally convincing, of course).

The ‘We’ position is general; it’s a philosophical, intellectual observation, not an emotional experience.  In a song, I think it’s much weaker than the first person (‘I’).

So why do people use ‘We’ so often?  I can suggest a few possibilities.

For one – they disagree with me and like it better (that’s always a possibility!).  For another, maybe they like to philosophize or teach in songs (I don’t), which is certainly their prerogative.

Also, I know sometimes it’s hard to sing vulnerable things from the ‘I’ perspective; it’s scary…  If the song’s narration really is autobiographical, even somewhat, one is exposed that way… if the song is sung by a character way different from the writer, maybe we’re sometimes afraid that people will think it really is us.

There is a great place for “We’ in songs, and that’s in anthemic songs, usually ones that are written with the idea of groups of people singing along, such as ‘We Shall Overcome’, ‘We Are The World’, ‘We Are The Champions’ , or ‘We Are Family’.  Then it makes perfect sense and can be great.

But what if the lyric to ‘Amazing Grace’ was –

Amazing Grace
How sweet the sound
To save wretches like us

It’s easy to slip into this “We’ thing… and I think one should think twice and thrice before going there.  In each case, I think it’s worth asking if the ‘I’ perspective isn’t much more powerful.

Let me know your thoughts in the Comments section below:

images-5And please share on facebook etc. using these tabs –

Share this page on:

0Shares

2 Comments on “In Songs, ‘I’ Is Usually Better Than ‘We’”

  1. Great post! I really agree with this line especially: “The ‘We’ position is general; it’s a philosophical, intellectual observation, not an emotional experience.”

    I would go a step further and say that “we” can even sound preachy because it’s so impersonal. See: “we are the world”

    Compared to I/You, which are more vulnerable and invite the listener in as a real character in the story.

    I do think Artists use “we” successfully when they also set up the story using “I” and invite the listener in. For example, Lorde opens in Royals with:

    “I’ve never seen a diamond in the flesh/cut my teeth on wedding rings…”

    and in the chorus uses “we”:

    “We’ll never be royals/it don’t run in our blood”

    But doesn’t forget to invite the listener in a couple lines later:

    “So you can call me queen bee, and baby I’ll rule…”

    In this case, “we” adds a nice generalizing touch to help the song feel more anthemic rather than whiny. But the “I” and “You” make sure it feels personal. To Ke$ha’s credit, I think she also does this well in “We R Who We R” 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *